Discrepancies between N.Rich and Third-Party Analytics Tools
Last updated: April 1, 2026
At N.Rich, we understand the importance of accurate data when evaluating the performance of your account-based marketing campaigns. When comparing analytics, you may notice discrepancies between the analytics reported within our platform and those from third-party tools like Google Analytics (visits or sessions mismatch). Let's explore the factors contributing to these differences :
Advertising Engagement vs. Website Visits
It's crucial to distinguish between advertising engagement metrics and website visit metrics. While N.Rich reports on both, third-party analytics tools typically focus solely on website visits. This distinction is important to remember when comparing metrics across platforms as tools that focus on website visits will have more sophisticated and customisable configurations and technology.
Different Tracking Technologies
N.Rich and third-party analytics tools use proprietary tracking technologies that differ in definitions, methodology, configuration, and filtering rules. This inherently results in variations in reported numbers. Filtering in Google Analytics (or other tracking tools) may use less or more restrictive filters or allow the configuration of custom filters. The filtering methods and their aggressiveness vary between platforms, affecting reported visit counts. N.Rich also focuses on ABM-specific metrics, which can include additional layers of validation and identification to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the data reported within our platform. This includes filtering out visits originating from IP addresses not associated with any of your target accounts
Tracking and Tag Coverage
Discrepancies may arise from differences in how tracking tags are configured:
Check if N.Rich and third-party trackers are deployed on the same pages across the site.
Verify that both trackers fire in the correct sequence using the Tag Priority setting in your tag manager.
Use debugging tools to ensure all tags are firing correctly and at the right time. If you are using Google Tag Manager, you can debug your tags using their tag assistant.
Consent Management Configuration
Cookie Consent settings play a significant role in data discrepancies. The N.Rich tag can track visits happening on your website regardless of cookie consent (based on our tag working in cookieless and standard mode). Dedicated web analytics tags like Google Analytics often relies on stricter cookie consent policies. Users who do not opt-in for cookies will not be tracked, leading to lower reported visits. You can check for ways to understand your current consent management opt-in rate and how to optimise it.
Ad Blockers and Browser Tracking Protection
Tracking Protection in browsers blocks a range of tracking technologies to protect user privacy. This includes:
Third-party cookies
Often used by analytics tools to track user behaviour across websites.Tracking scripts
Essential tracking scripts may not load. Scripts associated with analytics platforms or advertising networks, causing certain visits or interactions to go untracked.Fingerprinting technologies
Techniques that collect unique user information to track devices. Third-party cookies used for session tracking may be blocked, preventing visits from being accurately logged.Cross-Site Tracking Prevention
Browsers prevent tracking across domains, which can interfere with attribution for multi-channel campaigns.
While beneficial for user privacy, these features can block critical trackers, leading to reduced visit counts in web analytics tools and impacts them differently (N.Rich tag might not be blocked by a specific tracker while Google Analytics tag might be blocked and vice-versa).
Landing Page/Website Load Speed
Web page loading speed impacts tag performance and effectiveness. If your web pages take too long to load, tags not fire in a timely manner or get blocked. Visitors may also leave before trackers are loaded, leading to low tracking effectiveness. You can try to:
Optimise landing page speed to ensure the analytics tracker loads before users exit the page.
Prioritise loading essential trackers first to reduce the impact of script blocking.
Use lightweight trackers to minimise latency.
Use tools like Google Pagespeed Insights to understand how to improve your website performance.
Audit Clicks and Visits (non-chargeable clicks)
When you use N.Rich to run your ABM campaigns, your ads will undergo an ad review process that happens across our advertising ecosystem. This results in test/audit clicks and visits aimed at making sure that your ads and destination pages adhere to advertising policies and standards used by the different ad networks.
The visits resulting from this process are not associated with real user engagement and do not reflect genuine traffic. N.Rich uses filtering to exclude non-chargeable clicks and visits from your final reports and dashboards to prevent these interactions from contributing to metrics like cost-per-click (CPC) or engagement rates. Third-party analytics tools may report these visits, leading to a mismatch between reported visits and actual user traffic.
Recommendation: Focus On Relative Trend
When using N.Rich alongside third-party analytics tools, it's essential to consider relative trends rather than discrepancies in reporting across two platforms. The factors impacting tracking and reporting are numerous and complex. Metrics will most likely never match and it’s more rational to focus on relative trends and patterns rather than absolute numbers. While the specific metrics may vary, the overall trends in user engagement should remain consistent across platforms.
If you want to see what N.Rich traffic is G4A collecting, you can see this article on instructions how to set up a G4A report.